Court Case Record COMMONWEALTH vs. DANIEL MACKINNON 2011-P-0316 UID(c8b1)


Court Case Number: 2011-P-0316

Case Number2011-P-0316
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CourtSuffolk Superior Court
Court Address
Field Date11/25/2008
Close Date06/28/2012


John P. Zanini, Esquire Helle Sachse, A.D.A. Janis DiLoreto Smith, A.D.A.CommonwealthPlaintiff/Appellee
Rebecca Rose, Esquire Lorenzo Perez, Esquire Samuel W. Fern, Esquire Amie R. Pelletier, EsquireDaniel MacKinnonDefendant/Appellant
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
02/25/2011 #1 Motion to waive entry fee, filed by Daniel MacKinnon, is allowed.
02/25/2011 #2 Entered.
02/25/2011 #3 Notice of entry sent.
04/06/2011 #4 MOTION to extend brief & appendix due date, filed by Daniel MacKinnon.
04/07/2011 #5 RE#3: Allowed to 06/30/11. Notice
06/28/2011 #6 MOTION to extend brief & appendix due date, filed by Daniel MacKinnon.
06/28/2011 #7 RE#4: Allowed to 8/1/11. No further enlargement should be anticipated. *Notice.
08/01/2011 #8 SERVICE of brief & appendix for Defendant/Appellant Daniel MacKinnon.
08/08/2011 #9 Notice of appearance of Helle Sachse for Commonwealth.
08/31/2011 #10 Notice of appearance of Janis DiLoreto Noble for Commonwealth.
08/31/2011 #11 MOTION to extend brief due date of Commonwealth.
09/02/2011 #12 RE#8: Extension to 12/16/2011 granted for filing of brief of Commonwealth, Plaintiff/Appellee. No further enlargement to be anticipated. Notice to counsel.
12/16/2011 #13 MOTION to extend brief due date of Commonwealth.
12/16/2011 #14 Letter from Rebecca Rose, Esquire re: attached with one complete transcript (9 volumes) on paper, of the appellant's SDP trial.
12/23/2011 #15 RE#9: Allowed to 01/09/12 (Mills, J.). Notice
01/12/2012 MOTION to extend brief due date of Commonwealth.
01/13/2012 SERVICE of brief for Plaintiff/Appellee Commonwealth.
01/17/2012 RE#11: Allowed by the Court for filing 1/13/2012. (Mills, J.)
03/05/2012 ORDER: Upon entry of this case in the Appeals Court, the clerk's office designated it as fully impounded. However, review of the Superior Court's docket indicates that the case was not impounded in that court. Further, it appears that the case should not be impounded because it is the respondent's appeal from his civil commitment as a sexually dangerous person, per G. L. c. 123A, 14(d), and cases of this nature are not required to be impounded by the statute. Consequently, the docket in this case is hereby changed to "partial impoundment" in the event that the record contains names of victims whose identity shall not be disseminated to the public pursuant to G. L. c. 265, s 24C. The parties' briefs and record appendix must comply with G. L. c. 265, ยง 24C; Mass.R.A.P. 16 (d), 16(m), and 18 (g). By the court 3/05/12. *Notice/Attest.
03/08/2012 Notice of 04/10/2012, 9:30 AM argument at John Adams Courthouse, Courtroom 3 (a3) sent.
04/10/2012 Oral argument held. (Cohen, J., Grainger, J., Milkey, J.).
05/18/2012 Decision: Rule 1:28 Judgment affirmed (Cohen, Grainger, Milkey, JJ.). *Notice.