Court Case Record COMMONWEALTH vs. CHRISTOPHER WAGNER 2014-P-1092 UID(d13b)


Court Case Number: 2014-P-1092

Case Number2014-P-1092
Case TypeCriminal
StateMassachusetts, MA
CourtBristol Superior Court
Court Address
Field Date09/09/2011
Close Date12/28/2015


David B. Mark, A.D.A. Owen J. Murphy, A.D.A.CommonwealthPlaintiff/Appellee
Jacob B. Stone, EsquireChristopher WagnerDefendant/Appellant
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
07/15/2014 #1 Transcripts received: volumes: 6 ; on 3 CD'S^ Trial= 12/2/2013 12/3/2013 12/4/2013 Continued Sentencing Hearing = 12/12/2013 Suppression Hearing = 6/3/2013 Motion to Suppress = 6/4/2012
08/04/2014 #2 Corrected Transcripts received: volumes: 1; cds: 1 in 12/02/2013 = Trial^
08/18/2014 #3 Additional Transcripts received: volumes: 1 on 1 cd (8 omitted pages). 12/02/2013 - Trial^
07/15/2014 #4 Entered.
07/15/2014 #5 Notice of entry sent.
08/04/2014 #6 Revised docket entries (one copy) received from Bristol Superior Court.
08/25/2014 #7 Docketing Statement received from Christopher Wagner^
08/27/2014 #8 MOTION to extend brief & appendix due date, filed by Christopher Wagner.
09/02/2014 #9 RE#5: Allowed to 10/03/2014. Notice sent.
10/06/2014 #10 MOTION to extend brief & appendix due date, filed by Christopher Wagner.
10/08/2014 #11 RE#6: Allowed to 10/24/2014. Notice sent.
10/24/2014 #12 SERVICE of brief & appendix for Defendant/Appellant Christopher Wagner.
11/28/2014 #13 MOTION to extend brief due date of Commonwealth.
12/03/2014 #14 RE#8: Allowed to 02/23/2015. Notice sent.
02/26/2015 #15 MOTION to late filing brief, filed by Commonwealth.
02/27/2015 #16 RE#9: Allowed and accepted for filing this date. *Notice.
02/27/2015 #17 SERVICE of brief for Plaintiff/Appellee Commonwealth.
07/08/2015 #18 Notice sent seeking information on unavailability for oral argument in September 2015
07/15/2015 #19 Letter of Owen J. Murphy, A.D.A. unavailable for oral argument 9/17.
07/20/2015 Motion for leave to file Moffett Memorandum, filed by Christopher Wagner.
07/28/2015 RE#12: The Clerk's Office has received the referenced document from Christopher Wagner, who, according to the case docket, is represented by counsel. The document is noted as received on the docket, but the court will take no further action because it was not filed by counsel. Where counsel is on record as representing a party, only that counsel has authority to make filings in the court for the party, and only those filings will be reviewed and acted on by the court. Christopher Wagner should direct future inquiries and requests to counsel who can then making appropriate filings. This notice will not be sent in the future in response to any subsequent submissions from Christopher Wagner. Notice to counsel and Christopher Wagner
08/03/2015 MOTION to stay, filed by Christopher Wagner.