seal

Court Case Record COMMONWEALTH v. DAVID PAVLAS, RENE SUMAILI, LEON DUFRESNE & SALY REACH SJ-2018-0156 UID(e62e)


COMMONWEALTH v. DAVID PAVLAS, RENE SUMAILI, LEON DUFRESNE & SALY REACH Court Case Record

Court Case Number: SJ-2018-0156


 
Case NumberSJ-2018-0156
Case TitleCOMMONWEALTH v. DAVID PAVLAS, RENE SUMAILI, LEON DUFRESNE & SALY REACH
Case Type
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyLowell DCt, jury, MI
CourtLowell DCt, jury, MI
Court Address
Phone
Field Date04/06/2018
Close Date05/21/2018

Parties

CounselNameType
Alexei Tymoczko, EsquireDavid Pavlas Defendant/Petitioner
Alexei Tymoczko, EsquireRene Sumaili Defendant/Petitioner
Alexei Tymoczko, EsquireLeon Dufresne Defendant/Petitioner
Alexei Tymoczko, EsquireSaly Reach Defendant/Petitioner
Nicole Marie Nixon, Assistant District AttorneyCommonwealth Plaintiff/Respondent
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
04/06/2018 Case entered.
04/06/2018 #1 MOTION to Waive Costs with Affidavit, filed for Saly Reach, Leon Dufresne, Rene Sumaili and David Pavlas, filed by Atty. Alexei Tymoczko.
04/06/2018 #2 Application for Leave to File Interlocutory Appeal of Denial of Joint Motions to Dismiss with Certificate of Service, Memorandum in Support, Exhibits 1-2 and Record Appendix, filed for David Pavlas, Rene Sumaili, Leon Dufresne, Saly Reach by Atty. Alexei Tymoczko.
04/06/2018 Fee Waiver ALLOWED by Judge. (Gants, C.J.)
04/06/2018 #3 Memorandum In Support Of Application For Leave To File Interlocutory Appeal with attached Exhibits and Certificate of Service filed by Atty. Alexei Tymoczko.
04/30/2018 #4 Commonwealth's Opposition To Defendants' Petition For Relief Pursuant To G. L. c. 211, § 3 with Certificate of Service filed by ADA Nicole Nixon.
05/02/2018 Under advisement. (Gants, C.J.).
05/21/2018 #5 JUDGMENT: ... "A party seeking review under G. L. c. 211, § 3 must "demonstrate both a substantial claim of violation of [his] substantive rights and error that cannot be remedied under the ordinary review process." ... The error claimed here, denial of a motion to dismiss, can be remedied under the ordinary review process. If any of the defendants are convicted, they can appeal their conviction on the grounds stated here, and seek a stay of their sentence pending appeal. For the above reasons, it is ORDERED that the petition is hereby DENIED without hearing." (Gants, C.J.)
05/22/2018 #6 Notice to counsel/parties, regarding paper #5 filed.