seal

Court Case Record COMM OF MASS/MASS HIGHWAY DEPT. vs. MA ORGANIZATION STATE ENGINEERS & SCIENTISTS 2010-P-1256 UID(9a51)


COMM OF MASS/MASS HIGHWAY DEPT. vs. MA ORGANIZATION STATE ENGINEERS & SCIENTISTS Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2010-P-1256


 
Case Number2010-P-1256
Case TitleCOMM OF MASS/MASS HIGHWAY DEPT. vs. MA ORGANIZATION STATE ENGINEERS & SCIENTISTS
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountySuffolk
CourtSuffolk Superior Court
Court Address
Phone
Field Date06/05/2007
Close Date03/22/2012

Parties

CounselNameType
Christopher J. Groll, Esquire Withdrawn Mary H. McCauley, Esquire James A. Sweeney, A.A.G.Comm of Mass/Mass Highway Dept.Plaintiff/Appellee
Eric P. Klein, EsquireMA Organization State Engineers & ScientistsDefendant/Appellant
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
07/21/2010 #1 Entered.
07/21/2010 #2 Notice of entry sent.
07/26/2010 #3 JOINT MOTION to extend appellant's brief & appendix due date, filed by MA Organization State Engineers & Scientists and Comm of Mass/Mass Highway Dept.
07/27/2010 #4 RE#2: Although no "good cause" for the requested enlargement as required by MRAP 14(b) is provided, the appellant's brief may be filed on or before 9/29/10. Notice
08/25/2010 #5 Notice of appearance of Mary H. McCauley, Esquire for Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Mass Highway Department and request to remove Christopher J. Groll, Esquire.
09/29/2010 #6 SERVICE of brief & appendix for Defendant/Appellant MA Organization State Engineers & Scientists.
10/29/2010 #7 MOTION to extend brief due date of Comm of Mass/Mass Highway Dept..
11/02/2010 #8 RE#5: Allowed to 11/05/2010. Notice to counsel.
11/05/2010 #9 SERVICE of brief for Plaintiff/Appellee Comm of Mass/Mass Highway Dept..
03/04/2011 #10 Notice of 04/06/2011, 9:30 AM argument at John Adams Courthouse, Courtroom 4 sent.
03/30/2011 MOTION to Postpone Argument, filed by Comm of Mass/Mass Highway Dept.
04/01/2011 ORDER: The motion to continue argument is DENIED. Notice that these cases would be heard on April 6 was sent to the parties on March 4. The motion to postpone was filed on March 30, when it was too late to insert other cases on the April 6 list. Moreover, nothing in the motion suggests that argument by another attorney would be impossible, or even difficult. (McHugh, Brown & Grainger, JJ.). Notice/attest
04/06/2011 Oral argument held. (McHugh, J., Brown, J., Grainger, J.).
02/23/2012 Decision: Full Opinion (McHugh, J.) The judgments of the Superior Court are vacated, and the cases are remanded to that court for entry of new judgments confirming the arbitrators' awards. *Notice.
03/22/2012 RESCRIPT to Trial Court.