seal

Court Case Record CLARICE WHITE vs. ELSEVIER, INC. & others 2013-J-0361 UID(3874)


CLARICE WHITE vs. ELSEVIER, INC. & others Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2013-J-0361


 
Case Number2013-J-0361
Case TitleCLARICE WHITE vs. ELSEVIER, INC. & others
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyMiddlesex
CourtMiddlesex Superior Court
Court Address
Phone
Field Date08/26/2013
Close Date08/27/2013

Parties

CounselNameType
Steven B. Rotman, Esquire Lawrence L. Jones, II, Pro Hac Vice Attorney Gregory Bubalo, Pro Hac Vice AttorneyClarice WhitePlaintiff/Respondent
Ralph T. Lepore, III, Esquire Caroline Johnson Tanner, Pro Hac Vice AttorneyElsevier, Inc.Defendant
Emily M. LaCroix, EsquireWal-Mart Stores, Inc.Defendant/Petitioner
Ralph T. Lepore, III, Esquire Caroline Johnson Tanner, Pro Hac Vice AttorneyGold Standard, Inc.Defendant
Peter M. Durney, Esquire Henninger S. Bullock, Pro Hac Vice AttorneyAlaven PharmaceuticalsDefendant
Jonathan F. Tabasky, EsquireActavis ElizabethDefendant
Jonathan F. Tabasky, EsquirePurepac PharmaceuticalsDefendant
Peter M. Durney, Esquire Henninger S. Bullock, Pro Hac Vice AttorneySchwarz Pharma, Inc.Defendant
Bruce H. Murray, EsquireWalgreens CompanyDefendant
Zachary N. Coseglia, Esquire Raymond M. Williams, Pro Hac Vice AttorneyWyeth, Inc.Defendant
Zachary N. Coseglia, Esquire Raymond M. Williams, Pro Hac Vice AttorneyWyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Defendant
James M. Campbell, Esquire InactiveGenerics Bidco I, LLCDefendant
Richard Oetheimer, EsquireTeva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Defendant
Sara Jane Shanahan, Esquire Tiffany Reece Clark, Pro Hac Vice Attorney Rex A. Littrell, Pro Hac Vice AttorneyPLIVA, Inc.Defendant
Sara Jane Shanahan, Esquire Tiffany Reece Clark, Pro Hac Vice Attorney Rex A. Littrell, Pro Hac Vice AttorneyBarr Laboratories, Inc.Defendant
Sara Jane Shanahan, Esquire Tiffany Reece Clark, Pro Hac Vice Attorney Rex A. Littrell, Pro Hac Vice AttorneyBarr Pharmaceuticals, LLCDefendant
Craig E. Stewart, EsquireWolters Kluwers HealthDefendant
Craig E. Stewart, EsquireWolters Kluwer U.S. CorporationDefendant
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
08/26/2013 #1 Petition pursuant to M.G.L. c. 231, ยง 118 with attachments, filed by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. ^
08/27/2013 RE#1: The defendant, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., has filed a petition pursuant to G.L. c. 231, s. 118 (first para.), seeking review of an order entered by a judge of the Superior Court denying its motion to dismiss. The single justice is without authority to vacate the challenged order because to do so would be outcome determinative; this is prohibited by Mass.R.A.P. 15(c). Although the defendant's petition does not request leave to take an interlocutory appeal from the order denying the motion to dismiss, I have reviewed the petition and supporting materials to determine whether such leave should be granted and conclude that an interlocutory appeal is not warranted. See Long v. Wickett, 50 Mass. App. Ct. 380, 387-389 (2000) (discussing "the appellate courts' traditional abhorrence of piecemeal appellate review"). The petition is denied. (Vuono, J.). *Notice/Attest/Henry, J.
09/04/2013 Memo: Notice of docket entry RE#1 sent to Craig Stewart, Esq. returned as "attempted, not known." Resent to address listed on Mass BBO website.