seal

Court Case Record CHARLES DIVRIS vs. ROBERT E. DOUGLAS, D.D.S. & others 2011-P-1182 UID(3799)


CHARLES DIVRIS vs. ROBERT E. DOUGLAS, D.D.S. & others Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2011-P-1182


 
Case Number2011-P-1182
Case TitleCHARLES DIVRIS vs. ROBERT E. DOUGLAS, D.D.S. & others
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyWorcester
CourtWorcester Superior Court
Court Address
Phone
Field Date02/23/2009
Close Date12/08/2011

Parties

CounselNameType
Charles DivrisPro Se Plaintiff/Appellant
Paul P. O'Connor, EsquireRobert E. Douglas, D.D.S.Defendant/Appellee
Claudia A. Hunter, EsquireGeorge Groussis, M.D.Defendant/Appellee
Andrew C. Griesinger, EsquireHarvard Pilgrim Helath CareDefendant/Appellee
Jonathan A. Lax, EsquireW. David Kelly, D.M.D.Defendant
Aeclepion Health Care, LLCDefendant
Hurowitz Medical GroupDefendant
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
07/05/2011 #1 Entered.
07/05/2011 #2 Notice of entry sent.
07/14/2011 #3 Docketing Statement received from Charles Divris.
07/28/2011 #4 Copy of letter from counsel for W. David Kelly received from Worcester Superior Court.
07/29/2011 #5 Letter from Clerk's Office to Charles Divris re: Brief has not been accepted for filing due to the following: Wrong color Cover: should be blue; Rule 20(a). Insufficient number of copies: 7 are required; Rule 19(b)(1). Brief is not double spaced; Rule 20(a)(3). Does not contain a table of contents with page references; Rule 16(a)(1). Does not contain a table of authorities with page references; Rule 16(a)(l). Does not contain a statement of the case; Rule 16(a)(3). Does not contain a statement of the facts with appropriate references to the record appendix; Rules 16(a)(3) & 16(e). Brief is missing addendum containing copies of any written or oral findings or memorandum of decision pertinent to appeal; Rule 16(a)(6). Brief is missing addendum containing copies of pertinent constitutional clauses, statutes, rules or regulations, etc; Rule 16(f) Brief is missing certificate of compliance; Rule 16(k) Appendix does not contain a table of contents; Rule 18(d) Appendix pages are not consecutively numbered; Rule 18(d) Cover does not state name of the court or docket number; Rule 20(a) Corrections to be made on or before 08/15/11.
08/08/2011 #6 Plaintiff's Motion to remove judgment in favor of W. David Kelly D.M.D, correct corrupted lower court docket with request for hearing on short order notice, filed by Charles Divris.
08/08/2011 #7 Plaintiff's Motion to remove judgment in favor of George Groussis M.D., correct corrupted lower court docket with request for hearing on short order notice, filed by Charles Divris.
08/10/2011 #8 RE#4: To the extent the motion seeks to "remove" a judgment entered in the Superior Court in favor of David Kelly, D.M.D., and assuming that the appellant's appeal was filed in response to the entry of judgment therefor, the motion is denied, as the proper vehicle for challenging the correctness of the judgment is by the filing of a brief and record appendix in accordance with the Mass. Rules of Appellate Procedure. To the extent the motion seeks an order compelling the trial court to make corrections to the docket, this court is without the authority to grant such relief. *Notice.
08/10/2011 #9 RE#5: To the extent the motion seeks to "remove" a judgment entered in the Superior Court in favor of George Groussis M.D., and assuming that the appellant's appeal was filed in response to the entry of judgment therefor, the motion is denied, as the proper vehicle for challenging the correctness of the judgment is by the filing of a brief and record appendix in accordance with the Mass. Rules of Appellate Procedure. To the extent the motion seeks an order compelling the trial court to make corrections to the docket, this court is without the authority to grant such relief. *Notice.
08/15/2011 #10 MOTION to remand this case to Worcester Superior Court, motion to extend brief & appendix due date, filed by Charles Divris.
08/16/2011 #11 RE#6: Extension to 09/05/2011 granted for filing of brief of Charles Divris, Plaintiff/Appellant. The appellant's motion indicates that motions have been filed in the trial court which may seek relief from the judgment now on appeal. If so, it does not appear that the appellant sought leave of this court to proceed in the trial court for such relief, as is required. Notice to counsel.
08/12/2011 #12 Copy of letter from Charles P. Divris mailed to Attorney General Martha Coakley.
09/06/2011 #13 Docketing Statement received from Charles Divris.
09/08/2011 Affidavit of Correction, filed by Charles Divris.
09/08/2011 Notice to Charles Divris that brief is non-conforming for the reasons indicated on the checklist: #13 (Does not contain a statement of the facts), 15, 16, 17, 22 & *** Table of Authorities and Statement of Issues in wrong location, record appendix cover should be white, Table of contents for record appendix should be in record appendix *** . The party has until 09/19/2011 to file a conforming brief and appendix or a motion to accept nonconforming brief and appendix. *Notice.
09/13/2011 RE#9: Noted.
09/20/2011 MOTION to enlarge filing time for statement of facts, written findings, addendum, and motion to allow non conforming brief filed by Charles Divris.
09/23/2011 RE#11: Allowed. Appellant's brief, substantially conforming to MRAP, or motion to file a nonforming brief, is due on or before 10/20/11. *Notice.
09/21/2011 Letter from Judith Feinberg Albright (Nelson Kinder & Mosseau, P.C.) re: W. David Kelly, DMD, MD is not a party to this appeal, and request for a confirmation of appellate status.
09/28/2011 RE#12: The docket reflects W. David Kelly as a defendant but not an appellee. *Notice.
10/28/2011 Notice preceding dismissal: Standing Order Governing Dismissals for Lack of Prosecution.
11/22/2011 ORDER: DISMISSAL under Standing Order Governing Dismissals for Lack of Prosecution.