seal

Court Case Record BARBARA C. JOHNSON vs. MARC I. JOHNSON 2012-J-0150 UID(7201)


BARBARA C. JOHNSON vs. MARC I. JOHNSON Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2012-J-0150


 
Case Number2012-J-0150
Case TitleBARBARA C. JOHNSON vs. MARC I. JOHNSON
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyEssex
CourtEssex Superior Court
Court Address
Phone
Field Date04/19/2012
Close Date05/11/2012

Parties

CounselNameType
Barbara C. JohnsonPro Se Plaintiff/Petitioner
Kenneth J. Rossetti, EsquireMarc I. JohnsonDefendant/Respondent
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
04/19/2012 #1 Petition pursuant to M.G.L. c. 231, § 118 with attachments, filed by Barbara C. Johnson.
04/19/2012 #2 RE#1: Without deciding the question of the petitioner's indigency, after review, all relief requested is denied. To the extent petitioner seeks review of an order of the trial court denying her request for waiver of costs associated with the preparation of transcripts, she is directed to G. L. c. 261, s 27D. (Meade, J.) *Notice/Attest/Cornetta, J.
04/23/2012 #3 Motion to recuse Judge William Meade on grounds of conflict of interest, prejudice, and failure to follow G.L.c. 261, §27D, relied upon for closing the case and MOTION to vacate closure of case and restore to the open list, filed by Barbara C. Johnson. ^
05/04/2012 #4 Copy of Petition for Further Appellant Review Pursuant to an exception to Mass.R.A.P.Rule 27.1 or Petition to Invoke the Superintendency Powers of the Full Panel of the Supreme Judicial Court, filed by Barbara C. Johnson.
05/08/2012 #5 RE#2: Petitioner's motion to recuse is allowed and the single justice's 4/19/12 action on paper #1 is hereby vacated. (Meade, J.) *Notice/Attest/Cornetta, J..
05/11/2012 #6 RE#2 (Revised Action): To the extent legitimate issues have been raised on appeal, they are more appropriate for review by a panel of the court. As to review of the trial judge's orders denying petitioner's motion for costs, the proper avenue of review is G. L. c. 261, §27D (which the trial judge specifically noted in his ruling). Accordingly, all relief requested in the petition is denied (Trainor, J.). Notice/attest/Cornetta, J.
05/24/2012 Copy of "Findings, Rulings and Order" dated 5/17/12 of Judge Cornetta , received from Essex Superior Court.^
05/31/2012 Notice of appeal pursuant to MRAP 15(c) with attachments (contained impounded documents), filed by Barbara C. Johnson.
05/31/2012 Petition for Rehearing, filed by Barbara C. Johnson.
06/11/2012 RE#5: The notice of appeal filed by the petitioner is hereby struck, as there is no right of appeal from the denial of petition, filed pursuant to G.L. c. 231, § 118 (first par.), which seeks review of a non-injunctive order. See Gibbs Ford, Inc. v. United Truck Leasing Corp., 399 Mass. 8, n.8 (1987); Packaging Indus. Group, Inc. v. Cheney, 380 Mass. 609, 614 (1980). (Wolohojian, J.). *Notice.
06/11/2012 RE#6: The within is treated as a motion for reconsideration of the Court's Order, entered on 5/11/12, and as such it is allowed. Upon reconsideration, however, the order of that date, denying all requested relief, is to stand.(Trainor, J.). *Notice.