seal

Court Case Record Andrew and Williamson Sales Co. v. Pablos et al. D069607 UID(3116)


Andrew and Williamson Sales Co. v. Pablos et al. Court Case Record

Court Case Number: D069607


 
Case NumberD069607
Case TitleAndrew and Williamson Sales Co. v. Pablos et al.
Case TypeCV
StateCalifornia, CA
CountyAll Counties
CourtAppellate Court
Court Address4th Appellate District Division 1
Phone
Field Date
Close Date11/4/2016

Parties

CounselNameType
Morgan J.C. Scudi
Scudi & Ayers, LLP
5440 Morehouse Drive, Suite 4400
San Diego, CA 92121

Jimmy Ray Ayers
Scudi & Ayers LLP
5440 Morehouse Dr., #4400
San Diego, CA 92121-6723

Andrew and Williamson Sales Co.Plaintiff and Appellant
Victor A. Vilaplana
Foley & Lardner LLP
3579 Valley Centre Dr., Ste 300
San Diego, CA 92130

Carlos Armando Espinoza PablosDefendant and Respondent
Victor A. Vilaplana
Foley & Lardner LLP
3579 Valley Centre Dr., Ste 300
San Diego, CA 92130

Javier Espinoza PablosDefendant and Respondent
Victor A. Vilaplana
Foley & Lardner LLP
3579 Valley Centre Dr., Ste 300
San Diego, CA 92130

Juan Pablo Espinoza PablosDefendant and Respondent
Victor A. Vilaplana
Foley & Lardner LLP
3579 Valley Centre Dr., Ste 300
San Diego, CA 92130

Gonzalo Espinoza AvilaDefendant and Respondent
Victor A. Vilaplana
Foley & Lardner LLP
3579 Valley Centre Dr., Ste 300
San Diego, CA 92130

Antonio Arias ContrerasDefendant and Respondent
Victor A. Vilaplana
Foley & Lardner LLP
3579 Valley Centre Dr., Ste 300
San Diego, CA 92130

Ramon De Jesus Machado GalvezDefendant and Respondent
Victor A. Vilaplana
Foley & Lardner LLP
3579 Valley Centre Dr., Ste 300
San Diego, CA 92130

Juan Ramon Navarrete GarciaDefendant and Respondent
Victor A. Vilaplana
Foley & Lardner LLP
3579 Valley Centre Dr., Ste 300
San Diego, CA 92130

Diana Claudette Burgueno MendivilDefendant and Respondent
Todd Stephen Kartchner
Fennemore Craig
2394 E Camelback Rd Ste 600
Phoenix, AZ 85016

Agricola Gotsis, S.A. de C.V.Defendant and Respondent
Todd Stephen Kartchner
Fennemore Craig
2394 E Camelback Rd Ste 600
Phoenix, AZ 85016

Omega Produce Company, Inc.Defendant and Respondent

Maui Fresh International, LLCDefendant and Respondent
Docket (Register of Actions)
Date Description Notes
01/21/2016 Notice of appeal lodged/received. Filed on January 8, 2016 by Andrew and Williamson Sales Co.
01/21/2016 Appellate package sent.
01/21/2016 Proceeding by 8.124 - no reporter's transcript. 1/19/16
01/27/2016 Civil case information statement filed. Andrew and Williamson Sales Co.
02/03/2016 Filing fee. From Superior Court
02/08/2016 70 day letter sent (rule 8.124).
03/29/2016 Filed letter from: Appellant's letter re Maui Fresh is not a party to this appeal.
03/29/2016 Stipulation of extension of time filed: APPELLANT'S APPENDIX AND OPENING BRIEF FILED. Due on 04/28/2016 By 30 Day(s)
04/28/2016 APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF. Plaintiff and Appellant: Andrew and Williamson Sales Co. Attorney: Jimmy Ray Ayers
04/28/2016 Joint appendix filed.
04/28/2016 Certificate of interested entities and parties filed by: Plaintiff and Appellant: Andrew and Williamson Sales Co. Attorney: Jimmy Ray Ayers CIP in Brief
06/08/2016 RESPONDENT'S BRIEF. Defendant and Respondent: Agricola Gotsis, S.A. de C.V. Attorney: Todd Stephen Kartchner Defendant and Respondent: Omega Produce Company, Inc. Attorney: Todd Stephen Kartchner
06/08/2016 Certificate of interested entities and parties filed by: Defendant and Respondent: Agricola Gotsis, S.A. de C.V. Attorney: Todd Stephen Kartchner Defendant and Respondent: Omega Produce Company, Inc. Attorney: Todd Stephen Kartchner CIP in Brief
06/27/2016 RESPONDENT'S BRIEF. Defendant and Respondent: Carlos Armando Espinoza Pablos Attorney: Victor A. Vilaplana Defendant and Respondent: Javier Espinoza Pablos Attorney: Victor A. Vilaplana Defendant and Respondent: Juan Pablo Espinoza Pablos Attorney: Victor A. Vilaplana Defendant and Respondent: Gonzalo Espinoza Avila Attorney: Victor A. Vilaplana Defendant and Respondent: Antonio Arias Contreras Attorney: Victor A. Vilaplana Defendant and Respondent: Ramon De Jesus Machado Galvez Attorney: Victor A. Vilaplana Defendant and Respondent: Juan Ramon Navarrete Garcia Attorney: Victor A. Vilaplana Defendant and Respondent: Diana Claudette Burgueno Mendivil Attorney: Victor A. Vilaplana
06/28/2016 Oral argument waiver notice sent. 7/8
06/27/2016 Certificate of interested entities and parties filed by: Defendant and Respondent: Carlos Armando Espinoza Pablos Attorney: Victor A. Vilaplana Defendant and Respondent: Javier Espinoza Pablos Defendant and Respondent: Juan Pablo Espinoza Pablos Defendant and Respondent: Gonzalo Espinoza Avila Defendant and Respondent: Antonio Arias Contreras Defendant and Respondent: Ramon De Jesus Machado Galvez Defendant and Respondent: Juan Ramon Navarrete Garcia Defendant and Respondent: Diana Claudette Burgueno Mendivil CIP in Brief
06/28/2016 Request for oral argument filed by: Respondent Omega Produce/15 (Conditional)
06/29/2016 Request for oral argument filed by: A/15
07/06/2016 Request for oral argument filed by: R/15
07/14/2016 Stipulation of extension of time filed: APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF. Due on 08/08/2016 By 21 Day(s)
08/04/2016 APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF. Plaintiff and Appellant: Andrew and Williamson Sales Co. Attorney: Jimmy Ray Ayers
08/05/2016 CASE FULLY BRIEFED.
Disposition
Description: Affirmed/part, rev/part, remanded w/direction
Date: 11/04/2016
Status: Final The order granting Omega's motion to quash on forum non conveniens grounds is reversed. The order granting the motion to quash based on the lack of personal jurisdiction is affirmed as to Carlos Espinoza, Navarrete, and Burgueño, and reversed as to Javier Espinoza, Juan Espinoza, Arias and Machado. The matter is remanded for the trial court to enter a new order denying Omega's motion, granting the motion to quash of Carlos Espinoza, Navarrete, and Burgueño, and denying the motion of Javier Espinoza, Juan Espinoza, Arias and Machado. The parties shall bear their own costs.
Publication Status: Signed Unpublished
Author: O'Rourke, Terry B.
Participants: Irion, Joan K. (Concur) McConnell, Judith D. (Concur)
Case Citation: none