seal

Court Case Record ALBERT PACHECO vs. MASS TREATMENT CENTER 2013-P-0034 UID(30ef)


ALBERT PACHECO vs. MASS TREATMENT CENTER Court Case Record

Court Case Number: 2013-P-0034


 
Case Number2013-P-0034
Case TitleALBERT PACHECO vs. MASS TREATMENT CENTER
Case TypeCivil
StateMassachusetts, MA
CountyBristol
CourtBristol Superior Court
Court Address
Phone
Field Date04/27/2009
Close Date10/03/2014

Parties

CounselNameType
Frederic G. Bartmon, EsquireAlbert PachecoPlaintiff/Appellant
Mary P. Murray, EsquireMass Treatment CenterDefendant/Appellee
DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
01/08/2013 #1 Motion to waive entry fee, filed by Albert Pacheco, is allowed.
01/08/2013 #2 Entered.
01/08/2013 #3 Notice of entry sent.
02/13/2013 #4 MOTION to extend brief & appendix due date, filed by Albert Pacheco.
02/13/2013 #5 RE#3: Denied without prejudice to renewal accompanied by the filing of the required Docketing Statement, due on or before 02/20/2013. *Notice.
02/19/2013 #6 Motion to submit civil docketing statement via first class mail, filed by Albert Pacheco.
02/19/2013 #7 Docketing Statement received from Albert Pacheco. (paper copy) ^
02/19/2013 #8 RE#4: Allowed. *Notice.
02/27/2013 #9 Renewed motion to extend brief & appendix due date, filed by Albert Pacheco.
02/27/2013 #10 ORDER: Upon review, it appears that this case should not be impounded because it is the respondent's appeal from his civil commitment as a sexually dangerous person, per G. L. c. 123A, 14(d), and cases of this nature are not required to be impounded by the statute. Further, the Superior Court's docket contains no order of a judge impounding the case, see Trial Court Rule VIII, Rule 8, and the Superior Court's notice of assembly did not include a copy of any order of impoundment, see S.J.C. Rule 1:15, § 2(a). For these reasons, it appears that the impounded designation for the appeal should be removed, and the case be placed on the public docket. Each party is granted until fifteen days from the entry date of this order to serve and file a letter in response to this order that states any objection to the removal of the impounded designation, and the legal grounds for such objection. In addition, the letters should identify what, if any, information is contained in the parties' briefs and record appendix that must be redacted or impounded. See G. L. c. 265, § 24C; Mass.R.A.P. 16 (d), as amended, 425 Mass 1601 (1997), 16(m), 425 Mass. 1601 (1997) and 18 (g), 425 Mass. 1602 (1997). *Notice/Attest.
02/27/2013 #11 RE#6: Allowed to 6/20/13. No further enlargement should be anticipated. *Notice.
05/30/2013 #12 MOTION to extend brief & appendix due date, filed by Albert Pacheco.
05/31/2013 #13 RE#8: Allowed to 08/20/13 (Kantrowitz, J.). Notice
08/29/2013 #14 SERVICE of brief & appendix (1 vol), 2 copies transcript (7 Vols), Exhibits (1 vol) for Plaintiff/Appellant Albert Pacheco.
10/03/2013 #15 Notice of appearance of Mary P. Murray for Mass Treatment Center.
10/03/2013 #16 MOTION to extend brief due date of Mass Treatment Center.
10/04/2013 #17 RE#11: Extension to 01/27/2014 granted for filing of brief of Mass Treatment Center, Defendant/Appellee. Notice to counsel.
01/27/2014 MOTION to extend brief due date of Mass Treatment Center.
01/30/2014 RE#12: Allowed in part to 02/14/2014. No further enlargements. The case will be scheduled for oral argument before the end of the court's June sitting. (Grainger, J.). Notice sent.
02/11/2014 Notice sent seeking information on unavailability for oral argument in April 2014
02/14/2014 Letter of Mary P. Murray, Esquire unavailable for oral argument 4/4, 4/8, 4/9.
02/14/2014 MOTION for leave to file supplemental record appendix, filed by Mass Treatment Center.